Leadership Book Presentation
The Five Dysfunctions
of aTeam A L E A D E R S H I P FA B L E
Patrick Lencioni
01_960756_ffirs_16.qxd 1/13/06 8:57 AM Page iii
01_960756_ffirs_16.qxd 1/13/06 8:57 AM Page ii
Also by Patrick Lencioni
Leadership Fables
The Five Temptations of a CEO
The Four Obsessions of an Extraordinary Executive
Death by Meeting
Silos, Politics, and Turf Wars
Field Guide
Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of a Team
01_960756_ffirs_16.qxd 1/13/06 8:57 AM Page i
01_960756_ffirs_16.qxd 1/13/06 8:57 AM Page ii
The Five Dysfunctions
of aTeam A L E A D E R S H I P FA B L E
Patrick Lencioni
01_960756_ffirs_16.qxd 1/13/06 8:57 AM Page iii
Copyright © 2002 by Patrick Lencioni.
Published by Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741 www.josseybass.com
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
Readers should be aware that Internet Web sites offered as citations and/or sources for further information may have changed or disappeared between the time this was written and when it is read.
Jossey-Bass books and products are available through most bookstores. To contact Jossey-Bass directly call our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739, outside the U.S. at 317-572-3986, or fax 317-572-4002.
Jossey-Bass also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lencioni, Patrick, 1965–
The five dysfunctions of a team : a leadership fable / Patrick Lencioni. p. cm.
ISBN 0-7879-6075-6 1. Teams in the workplace. I. Title.
HD66 .L456 2002 658.4’036—dc21 2001008099
Printed in the United States of America FIRST EDITION
HB Printing 20 19 18 17 16
01_960756_ffirs_16.qxd 1/13/06 8:57 AM Page iv
v
Introduction vii
The Fable 1 Luck 3
Part One: Underachievement 5
Part Two: Lighting the Fire 27
Part Three: Heavy Lifting 115
Part Four: Traction 171
The Model 185 An Overview of the Model 187
Team Assessment 191
Understanding and Overcoming
the Five Dysfunctions 195
A Note About Time: Kathryn’s Methods 221
A Special Tribute to Teamwork 223
Acknowledgments 225
About the Author 229
CONTENTS
02_960756_ftoc.qxd 3/25/05 9:55 AM Page v
To Dad, for teaching me the value of work. And to Mom, for encouraging me to write.
03_960756_flast.qxd 3/25/05 9:59 AM Page vi
INTRODUCTION
Not finance. Not strategy. Not technology. It is teamwork
that remains the ultimate competitive advantage, both be-
cause it is so powerful and so rare.
A friend of mine, the founder of a company that grew
to a billion dollars in annual revenue, best expressed the
power of teamwork when he once told me, “If you could
get all the people in an organization rowing in the same di-
rection, you could dominate any industry, in any market,
against any competition, at any time.”
Whenever I repeat that adage to a group of leaders, they
immediately nod their heads, but in a desperate sort of way.
They seem to grasp the truth of it while simultaneously sur-
rendering to the impossibility of actually making it happen.
And that is where the rarity of teamwork comes into
play. For all the attention that it has received over the years
from scholars, coaches, teachers, and the media, teamwork
is as elusive as it has ever been within most organizations.
The fact remains that teams, because they are made up of
imperfect human beings, are inherently dysfunctional.
vii
03_960756_flast.qxd 3/25/05 9:59 AM Page vii
viii
Introduction
But that is not to say that teamwork is doomed. Far
from it. In fact, building a strong team is both possible and
remarkably simple. But it is painfully difficult.
That’s right. Like so many other aspects of life, team-
work comes down to mastering a set of behaviors that are
at once theoretically uncomplicated, but extremely difficult
to put into practice day after day. Success comes only for
those groups that overcome the all-too-human behavioral
tendencies that corrupt teams and breed dysfunctional pol-
itics within them.
As it turns out, these principles apply to more than just
teamwork. In fact, I stumbled upon them somewhat by ac-
cident in my pursuit of a theory about leadership.
A few years ago I wrote my first book, The Five Temp-
tations of a CEO, about the behavioral pitfalls that plague
leaders. In the course of working with my clients, I began
to notice that some of them were “misusing” my theories in
an effort to assess and improve the performance of their
leadership teams—and with success!
And so it became apparent to me that the five tempta-
tions applied not only to individual leaders but, with a few
modifications, to groups as well. And not just within cor-
porations. Clergy, coaches, teachers, and others found that
these principles applied in their worlds as much as they did
in the executive suite of a multinational company. And that
is how this book came to be.
Like my other books, The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
begins with a story written in the context of a realistic but
03_960756_flast.qxd 3/25/05 9:59 AM Page viii
ix
Introduction
fictional organization. I have found that this allows read-
ers to learn more effectively by losing themselves in a story
and by being able to relate to the characters. It also helps
them understand how these principles can be applied in a
nontheoretical, real-world environment, where the pace of
work and the volume of daily distractions make even the
simplest of tasks seem arduous.
In order to help you apply the material in your own or-
ganization, a brief section following the story outlines the
five dysfunctions in detail. That section also includes a team
assessment and suggested tools for overcoming the issues
that might be plaguing your team.
Finally, although this book is based on my work with
CEOs and their executive teams, its theories are applica-
ble for anyone interested in teamwork, whether you lead a
small department within a company or are simply a mem-
ber of a team that could use some improvement. Whatever
the case may be, I sincerely hope it helps your team over-
come its particular dysfunctions so that it can achieve more
than individuals could ever imagine doing alone. That, after
all, is the real power of teamwork.
03_960756_flast.qxd 3/25/05 9:59 AM Page ix
03_960756_flast.qxd 3/25/05 9:59 AM Page x
The Fable
03Lencioni/Fable 2/10/02 3:29 PM Page 1
03Lencioni/Fable 2/10/02 3:29 PM Page 2
LUCK
Only one person thought Kathryn was the right choice to be-come CEO of DecisionTech, Inc. Luckily for her, that per-son was the Chairman of the board. And so, less than a month after the previous chief ex-
ecutive had been removed, Kathryn Petersen took the reins
of a company that just two years earlier had been one of
the most talked-about, well-funded, and promising start-up
companies in the recent history of the Silicon Valley. She
could not have known just how far from grace the com-
pany had fallen in such a short period of time, and what
the next few months had in store for her.
3
04Lencioni/Luck 2/10/02 3:30 PM Page 3
04Lencioni/Luck 2/10/02 3:30 PM Page 4
PART ONE
❖
Under- achievement
05Lencioni/Part 1 2/10/02 3:30 PM Page 5
05Lencioni/Part 1 2/10/02 3:30 PM Page 6
BACKSTORY
DecisionTech was located in Half Moon Bay, a foggy, coastalfarming town just over the hills from the San Francisco Bay.It was not technically part of the Silicon Valley, but the Val- ley is not so much a geographical entity as a cultural one.
And DecisionTech certainly fit within that world.
It had the most experienced—and expensive—executive
team imaginable, a seemingly indestructible business plan,
and more top-tier investors than any young company could
hope for. Even the most cautious venture firms were lining
up to invest, and talented engineers were submitting their
resumés before the company had leased an office.
But that was almost two years earlier, which is a life-
time for a technology start-up. After its first few euphoric
months of existence, the company began experiencing a
series of ongoing disappointments. Critical deadlines
started to slip. A few key employees below the executive
level unexpectedly left the company. Morale deteriorated
7
06Lencioni/Backstory 2/10/02 3:31 PM Page 7
8
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
gradually. All of this in spite of the considerable advantages
that DecisionTech had amassed for itself.
On the two-year anniversary of the firm’s founding, the
board unanimously agreed to “ask” Jeff Shanley, the com-
pany’s thirty-seven-year-old CEO and cofounder, to step
down. He was offered the job of heading business devel-
opment, and to the surprise of his colleagues, he accepted
the demotion, not wanting to walk away from a potentially
huge payout should the company eventually go public.
And even in the difficult economic climate of the Valley,
the company had every reason to go public.
None of DecisionTech’s 150 employees were shocked
by Jeff’s removal. While most of them seemed to like him
well enough personally, they couldn’t deny that under his
leadership the atmosphere within the company had become
increasingly troubling. Backstabbing among the executives
had become an art. There was no sense of unity or cama-
raderie on the team, which translated into a muted level of
commitment. Everything seemed to take too long to get
done, and even then it never felt right.
Some boards might have been more patient with a
stumbling executive team. DecisionTech’s was not. There
was just too much at stake—and too high a profile—to
watch the company waste away because of politics. Deci-
sionTech had already developed a reputation within the
Valley for being one of the most political and unpleasant
places to work, and the board couldn’t tolerate that kind
06Lencioni/Backstory 2/10/02 3:31 PM Page 8
9
Backstory
of press, especially when the future had looked so promis-
ing just a couple of years earlier.
Someone had to be accountable for the mess, and Jeff
was the man at the top. Everyone seemed relieved when
the board announced the decision to remove him.
Until three weeks later, when Kathryn was hired.
06Lencioni/Backstory 2/10/02 3:31 PM Page 9
KATHRYN
The executives couldn’t agree on which of Kathryn’s fea-
tures presented the biggest problem. There were so many.
First, she was old. Ancient, at least by Silicon Valley stan-
dards. Kathryn was fifty-seven.
More important, she had no real high-tech experience
other than serving as a board member of Trinity Systems,
a large technology company in San Francisco. Most of her
career had been spent in operational roles with decidedly
low-tech companies, the most notable of which was an au-
tomobile manufacturer.
But more than her age or experience, Kathryn just didn’t
seem to fit the DecisionTech culture.
She had started her career in the military, then married
a teacher and basketball coach at a local high school. After
raising three boys, she taught seventh grade for a few years
until she discovered her affinity for business.
At the age of thirty-seven, Kathryn enrolled in a three-
year business school night program, which she completed
a semester early at Cal State Hayward, which was not ex-
10
07Lencioni/Kathryn 2/10/02 3:31 PM Page 10
11
Kathryn
actly Harvard or Stanford. She then spent the next fifteen
years in and around manufacturing, until her retirement at
the age of fifty-four.
The fact that Kathryn was a woman was never an issue
for the executive team; two of them were women them-
selves. With much of their collective experience coming
from the somewhat progressive world of high tech, most
had worked for women at some time during their careers.
But even if her gender had been a problem for anyone on
the team, it would have been dwarfed by her glaring cul-
tural mismatch.
There was just no mistaking the fact that, on paper,
Kathryn was an old school, blue-collarish executive. That
presented a stark contrast to the DecisionTech executives
and middle managers, most of whom had little experience
working outside of the Valley. Some of them even liked to
brag that they hadn’t worn a suit—outside of a wedding—
since graduating from college.
It was no surprise that after first reading her resumé,
board members questioned the Chairman’s sanity when
he suggested they hire Kathryn. But he eventually wore
them down.
For one, the board believed their Chairman when he
flat out assured them that Kathryn would succeed. Second,
he had been known to have extremely good instincts about
people, notwithstanding the problem with Jeff. He certainly
wouldn’t make two mistakes in a row, they reasoned.
But perhaps most important of all (though no one would
07Lencioni/Kathryn 2/10/02 3:31 PM Page 11
12
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
admit it), DecisionTech was in a desperate situation. The
Chairman insisted that there weren’t too many capable ex-
ecutives willing to take on such a messy job given the cur-
rent state of affairs at the scarred company. “We should
consider ourselves lucky to have such a capable leader as
Kathryn available,” he successfully argued.
Whether or not that was true, the Chairman was deter-
mined to hire someone he knew and could trust. When
he called Kathryn to tell her about the job, he certainly could
not have known that he would be regretting the decision
just a few weeks later.
07Lencioni/Kathryn 2/10/02 3:31 PM Page 12
RATIONALE
No one was more surprised about the offer than Kathryn. Al-though she had known the Chairman for many years on apersonal level (Kathryn had actually first met him when her husband coached his oldest son in high school), she could
not have imagined that he thought so highly of her as an
executive.
Most of their relationship had been social, centering
around family, school, and local athletics. Kathryn assumed
that the Chairman had little idea about her life outside her
role as a mother and coach’s wife.
In fact, the Chairman had followed Kathryn’s career
with interest over the years, amazed at how successful she
had become with such relatively modest training. In less
than five years, she had become chief operating officer of
the Bay Area’s only automobile manufacturing plant, a U.S.-
Japanese joint venture. She held that job for the better part
of a decade and made the plant one of the most success-
ful cooperative enterprises in the country. And while the
13
08Lencioni/Rationale 2/10/02 3:32 PM Page 13
14
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
Chairman knew little about the car industry, he knew one
thing about Kathryn that convinced him she was perfect to
fix the problems at DecisionTech.
She had an amazing gift for building teams.
08Lencioni/Rationale 2/10/02 3:32 PM Page 14
GRUMBLINGS
If the executives at DecisionTech had any doubts aboutKathryn when her hiring was first announced—and theydid—they were even more concerned after their new lead- er’s first two weeks on the job.
It wasn’t that Kathryn did anything controversial or mis-
placed. It was that she did almost nothing at all.
Aside from a brief reception on her first day and sub-
sequent interviews with each of her direct reports, Kathryn
spent almost all of her time walking the halls, chatting with
staff members, and silently observing as many meetings as
she could find time to attend. And perhaps most contro-
versial of all, she actually asked Jeff Shanley to continue
leading the weekly executive staff meetings, where she just
listened and took notes.
The only real action that Kathryn took during those first
weeks was to announce a series of two-day executive re-
treats in the Napa Valley to be held over the course of the
next few months. As though she needed to give them any
15
09Lencioni/Grumblings 2/10/02 3:32 PM Page 15
16
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
more ammunition, none of her reports could believe she
had the gall to take them out of the office for so many days
when there was so much real work to be done.
And to make matters worse, when someone suggested
a specific topic for discussion during the first retreat, Kathryn
refused. She had her own agenda already set.
Even the Chairman was surprised, and a bit unnerved,
about the reports of Kathryn’s early performance. He came
to the conclusion that if she didn’t work out, he should
probably leave along with her. That was beginning to feel
like the most probable outcome.
09Lencioni/Grumblings 2/10/02 3:32 PM Page 16
OBSERVATIONS
After her first two weeks observing the problems at Deci-sionTech, Kathryn had more than a few moments when shewondered if she should have taken the job. But she knew that there was little chance that she would have turned it
down. Retirement had made her antsy, and nothing excited
her more than a challenge.
While there was no doubt that DecisionTech would be
a challenge, something seemed different about this one.
Though she had never really feared failure, Kathryn could
not deny that the prospect of letting the Chairman down
spooked her a little. To tarnish her reputation so late in her
career, and among friends and family, was enough to worry
even the most secure of people. And Kathryn was certainly
secure with herself.
After surviving a stint in the military, raising her boys,
watching countless buzzer-beating basketball games, and
standing up to union bosses, Kathryn decided she was not
about to be intimidated by a bunch of harmless yuppies
17
10Lencioni/Observatons 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 17
18
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
whose greatest hardships in life so far had been fighting
off the first signs of a receding hairline or an expanding
waistline. She believed that as long as the board would give
her enough time and leeway, she would be able to turn De-
cisionTech around.
And Kathryn’s lack of in-depth software experience did
not concern her. In fact, she felt certain that it provided her
with an advantage. Most of her staff seemed almost para-
lyzed by their own knowledge of technology, as though
they themselves would have to do the programming and
product design to make the company fly.
Kathryn knew that Jack Welch didn’t have to be an ex-
pert on toaster manufacturing to make General Electric a
success and that Herb Kelleher didn’t have to spend a life-
time flying airplanes to build Southwest Airlines. Despite
what her limited technical background might have indi-
cated, Kathryn felt that her understanding of enterprise soft-
ware and technology was more than sufficient for her to
lead DecisionTech out of the mess it was in.
What she could not have known when she accepted
the job, however, was just how dysfunctional her execu-
tive team was, and how they would challenge her in ways
that no one before had ever done.
10Lencioni/Observatons 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 18
THE STAFF
Employees referred to the DecisionTech executives as TheStaff. No one referred to them as a team, which Kathryn de-cided was no accident. In spite of their undeniable intelligence and impres-
sive educational backgrounds, The Staff’s behavior dur-
ing meetings was worse than anything she had seen in the
automotive world. Though open hostility was never really
apparent and no one ever seemed to argue, an underlying
tension was undeniable. As a result, decisions never seemed
to get made; discussions were slow and uninteresting, with
few real exchanges; and everyone seemed to be desperately
waiting for each meeting to end.
And yet, as bad as the team was, they all seemed like
well-intentioned and reasonable people when considered
individually. With just a few exceptions.
JEFF—FORMER CEO, BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
Essentially a generalist who loved networking within the
Valley, Jeff Shanley had raised a considerable amount of the
19
11Lencioni/Staff 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 19
20
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
company’s initial money and attracted many of the current
executives. No one could deny his prowess when it came
to venture capital or recruiting. But management was an-
other story.
Jeff ran staff meetings as though he were a student body
president reading from a textbook on protocol. He always
published an agenda before each meeting, and then dis-
tributed detailed minutes afterward. And unlike most other
high-tech companies, his meetings usually began on time
and always concluded exactly when they were scheduled
to end. The fact that nothing ever seemed to get done dur-
ing those meetings didn’t appear to bother him.
In spite of his demotion, Jeff maintained his seat on
the board of directors. Kathryn initially suspected that he
might resent her for taking his job, but she soon came to
the conclusion that Jeff was relieved to be, well, relieved
of his management responsibilities. Kathryn had little con-
cern about his presence on the board, or on her manage-
ment team. She suspected that his heart was in the right
place.
MIKEY—MARKETING
Marketing would be a critical function at DecisionTech, and
the board had been ecstatic to get someone as sought after
as Michele Bebe. Mikey, as she liked to be called, was well
known throughout the Valley as a brand-building genius.
Which made it all the more astonishing that she lacked a
few key social graces.
11Lencioni/Staff 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 20
21
The Staff
During meetings, she talked more than the others, oc-
casionally coming up with a brilliant idea, but more often
complaining about how the other companies she had
worked for did everything better than DecisionTech. It was
almost as though she were a spectator or, better yet, a vic-
tim of circumstance, at her new company. Though she nev-
er argued outright with any of her peers, she was known
to roll her eyes in apparent disgust when one of them dis-
agreed with anything she had to say about marketing.
Kathryn decided that Mikey was unaware of how she came
across to others. No one would purposefully act that way,
she reasoned.
So in spite of her talent and accomplishments, it was no
surprise to Kathryn that Mikey was the least popular among
the rest of the staff. With the possible exception of Martin.
MARTIN—CHIEF TECHNOLOGIST
A founder of the company, Martin Gilmore was the closest
thing that DecisionTech had to an inventor. He had de-
signed the original specs for the company’s flagship prod-
uct, and although others had done much of the actual
product development, the executives often said that Mar-
tin was the keeper of the crown jewels. That analogy was
due at least in part to the fact that Martin was British.
Martin considered himself to know as much about tech-
nology as anyone else in the Valley, which was probably
true. With advanced degrees from Berkeley and Cam-
bridge, and a track record of success as a chief architect at
11Lencioni/Staff 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 21
22
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
two other technology companies, he was seen as Decision-
Tech’s key competitive advantage, at least when it came to
human capital.
Unlike Mikey, Martin didn’t disrupt staff meetings. In
fact, he rarely participated. It wasn’t that he refused to at-
tend those meetings (even Jeff wouldn’t allow such a bla-
tant act of revolt); it was just that he always had his laptop
open, and he seemed to be constantly checking e-mail or
doing something similarly engrossing. Only when some-
one made a factually incorrect statement could Martin be
counted on to offer a comment, and usually a sarcastic one
at that.
At first, this was tolerable, maybe even amusing, to Mar-
tin’s peers, who seemed in awe of his intellect. But it began
to wear on the staff over time. And with the company’s re-
cent struggles, it had become an increasingly grating source
of frustration for many of them.
JR—SALES
In order to avoid confusing him with Jeff Shanley, everyone
called the head of sales JR. His real name was Jeff Rawlins,
but he seemed to enjoy the new moniker. JR was an ex-
perienced salesperson and a little older than the others—
mid-forties. He was usually tan, never rude, and always
agreed to do whatever the staff asked of him.
Unfortunately, JR rarely followed through. In those cases
when he came clean and acknowledged having made a
11Lencioni/Staff 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 22
23
The Staff
commitment that went unfulfilled, he apologized profusely
to whomever he had let down.
In spite of what the staff called JR’s flakiness, he was
able to maintain a measure of respect from his peers be-
cause of his track record. Before coming to DecisionTech,
he had never missed a quarterly revenue number in his en-
tire career in sales.
CARLOS—CUSTOMER SUPPORT
Though DecisionTech had relatively few customers, the
board felt strongly that the company would need to invest
early in customer service in order to prepare for growth.
Carlos Amador had worked with Mikey at two previous
companies, and she introduced him to the firm. Which was
ironic because the two of them couldn’t have been more
different.
Carlos spoke very little, but whenever he did, he had
something important and constructive to say. He listened
intently during meetings, worked long hours with no
complaint, and downplayed his prior accomplishments
whenever someone asked about them. If there was a low-
maintenance member of the staff, and a trustworthy one,
it was Carlos.
Kathryn was thankful not to have to worry about at least
one of her new direct reports, although she was somewhat
troubled that his specific role had not yet fully developed.
The fact that he willingly took on responsibility for product
11Lencioni/Staff 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 23
24
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
quality and any other unattractive duties that fell through
the gaps allowed her to focus on more pressing concerns.
JAN—CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
The role of the chief financial officer had been a critical
one at DecisionTech and would continue to be as long as
the company intended to go public. Jan Mersino knew
what she was getting into when she joined the company,
and she had played a key role supporting Jeff as he raised
impressive amounts of money from venture capitalists and
other investors.
Jan was a stickler for detail, took pride in her knowl-
edge of the industry, and treated the company’s money
as though it were her own. While the board had given Jeff
and the staff virtual free rein when it came to expenditures,
they did so only because they knew that Jan would not let
things get out of control.
NICK—CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
The final member of the executive staff was the most im-
pressive on paper. Nick Farrell had been vice president
of field operations for a large computer manufacturer in the
Midwest, and had moved his family to California to take
the DecisionTech job. Unfortunately for him, he had the
most ill-defined role of anyone on the team.
Nick was officially the chief operating officer of the
company, but that was only because he had demanded
the COO title as a condition of accepting the job. Jeff
11Lencioni/Staff 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 24
25
The Staff
and the board gave it to him because they believed he
would earn it within the year anyway if he performed ac-
cording to his billing. More importantly, they had become
addicted to hiring star executives, and losing Nick would
have hurt their winning percentage.
Of all the members of the executive staff, Nick had been
most directly impacted by the company’s sputtering start.
Given Jeff’s limitations as a manager, Nick had been hired
to spearhead DecisionTech’s growth, which included build-
ing an operational infrastructure, opening new offices
around the world, and leading the firm’s acquisition and in-
tegration efforts. Most of his responsibilities were currently
on hold, giving Nick little meaningful day-to-day work.
As frustrated as he was, Nick didn’t complain openly. To
the contrary, he worked hard to build relationships, though
sometimes shallow ones, with each of his colleagues, whom
he had quietly deemed to be inferior to him. And though he
certainly never said so to any of his peers, Nick felt he was
the only executive in the company qualified to be CEO. But
that would become obvious soon enough.
11Lencioni/Staff 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 25
11Lencioni/Staff 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 26
PART TWO
❖
Lighting the Fire
12Lencioni/Part 2 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 27
12Lencioni/Part 2 2/10/02 3:33 PM Page 28
FIRST TEST
It looked like just another of the many standard e-mail mes-sages that Kathryn was receiving on a regular basis now thatshe had been on the job for awhile. The subject header— “Customer Opportunity Next Week”—seemed innocuous
enough, even positive, especially considering that it came
from her acerbic chief engineer, Martin. And the note itself
was short. The most damaging ones usually are.
That it was not addressed to anyone in particular, but
was sent to the entire executive staff, only belied its in-
cendiary potential:
Just received a call from ASA Manufacturing. They’re
interested in reviewing our product to consider a purchase
next quarter. JR and I will be going down to meet with
them next week. Could be a big opportunity. We’ll be
back early Tuesday.
The fact that Martin avoided any mention of the sched-
uling conflict with the executive retreat only made the
29
13Lencioni/First Test 2/10/02 3:34 PM Page 29
30
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
situation worse for Kathryn. He had not asked permission
to miss the first day and a half of the off-site retreat, either
because he didn’t feel the need to do so or because he
wanted to avoid having to deal with the issue altogether.
Kathryn decided it didn’t matter which was true.
She resisted the temptation to avoid a confrontation
with Martin by firing off an e-mail reply. Kathryn decided
that this would be her first moment of truth as a CEO, and
moments of truth, she knew, are best handled face-to-face.
Kathryn found Martin sitting in his corner office read-
ing e-mail. His back was turned toward the open door, but
she didn’t bother knocking.
“Excuse me, Martin.” Kathryn waited for Martin to turn
around, which he took his time doing. “I just saw your
e-mail about ASA.”
He nodded, and she went on. “That’s great news. But
we’ll have to push the appointment back a few days be-
cause of the off-site.”
Martin was silent for an awkward moment, then re-
sponded without emotion but with his thickest English ac-
cent. “I don’t think you understand. This is a potential sales
opportunity. You don’t just reschedule . . .”
Kathryn interrupted and responded matter-of-factly. “No,
I do understand. But I think they’ll still be there next week.”
Not used to being countered directly, Martin became
just slightly agitated. “If your concern is about this Napa off-
site thing, then I think we may have our priorities confused.
We need to be out there selling.”
13Lencioni/First Test 2/10/02 3:34 PM Page 30
31
First Test
Kathryn took a breath and smiled to conceal her frus-
trations. “First of all, I only have one priority at this point:
we need to get our act together as a team, or we’re not
going to be selling anything.”
Martin said nothing.
After an awkward five seconds, Kathryn finished the
conversation. “So, I’ll be seeing you in Napa next week.”
She turned to leave, then turned back to face Martin again.
“Oh, and if you need any help rescheduling the ASA meet-
ing, let me know. I know Bob Tennyson, the CEO down
there. He sits on the Trinity board with me, and he owes
me a favor.”
With that, she left the room. Though Martin decided
not to push any further for the moment, he was not through
fighting.
13Lencioni/First Test 2/10/02 3:34 PM Page 31
END RUN
Jeff stopped by Kathryn’s office the next morning and askedher to lunch. She had planned to run an errand during thattime, but happily shifted her schedule to accommodate one of her direct reports. The oldest Mexican restaurant in Half
Moon Bay was as good a spot as any for a difficult con-
versation, he thought, because mostly locals ate there.
Before Jeff could broach the topic he wanted to dis-
cuss, Kathryn took care of some business of her own. “Jeff,
I want to thank you for leading the executive staff meet-
ings these past two weeks. It’s allowed me to sit back and
observe.”
He nodded politely to accept her minor but heartfelt
gratitude.
She continued. “After next week’s off-site, I’ll take over.
But I want you to know that you shouldn’t hold back dur-
ing the meetings. You should participate as fully as any
other staff member.”
32
14Lencioni/End Run 2/10/02 3:34 PM Page 32
33
End Run
Jeff nodded, “Fine. I don’t think that will be a prob-
lem.” He paused, then worked up the courage to raise the
issue that had provoked the lunch invitation. Straightening
his silverware nervously, he began. “Now that you men-
tion the off-site, I’d like to ask you a question.”
“Go ahead.” Kathryn was almost amused by Jeff’s dis-
comfort. And because she had anticipated a question about
her run-in with Martin, she was calm and confident.
“Well, yesterday, on the way out of the office, I talked
to Martin in the parking lot.” He waited, hoping Kathryn
would jump in and move the conversation forward from
there. She didn’t, so Jeff continued. “Well, he said something
to me about the ASA meeting and the off-site scheduling
problem.”
Again Jeff paused, hoping for his new boss to merci-
fully interrupt. This time she did, but only to prompt him
to continue. “Yes?”
Jeff swallowed. “Well, he believes, and frankly I think
I agree with him, that a customer meeting is more impor-
tant than an internal one. And so, if he and JR missed the
first day or so of the off-site, I think we would be okay.”
Kathryn chose her words carefully. “Jeff, I understand
your opinion, and I’m fine with your disagreeing with me,
especially when you tell me face-to-face.”
Jeff was noticeably relieved, for the moment.
“However, I was hired to make this organization work,
and right now it doesn’t.”
14Lencioni/End Run 2/10/02 3:34 PM Page 33
34
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
Jeff looked like he was trying to decide whether to
be humbled or angry, so Kathryn clarified. “I’m not trying
to criticize what you’ve done so far, because it seems to me
that no one cares more about the company than you do.”
His ego now assuaged, Kathryn drove the point home.
“But from a team standpoint, we are completely broken.
And one sales meeting is not going to have a meaningful
impact on our future, at least not until we straighten out
the leadership problems around here.”
Not knowing Kathryn very well, Jeff decided that any
further debate would be fruitless and possibly career-
limiting. He nodded as if to say, Okay, I guess it’s your call.
The two of them then engaged in small talk and ate one of
the fastest lunches in Half Moon Bay history before head-
ing back to the office.
14Lencioni/End Run 2/10/02 3:34 PM Page 34
DRAWING THE LINE
The conversation with Jeff had not fazed Kathryn. She hadcertainly expected some backlash about the Martin inci-dent from her inherited staff. But she didn’t expect it to come from the Chairman.
When he reached her at home that evening, she ini-
tially assumed he was calling to give her support.
“I just got off the phone with Jeff,” he announced in a
friendly tone.
“So, I guess you heard about my head-butt with Martin.”
Kathryn’s humorous and confident attitude pushed the
Chairman into a more serious mood. “Yes, and I’m a little
concerned.”
Kathryn was caught off guard. “You are?”
“Look, Kathryn, you know I don’t want to tell you how
to go about doing this, but maybe you should try to build
a few bridges over there before you start setting any on fire.”
Kathryn let a few moments pass before replying. As
surprised as she was by the Chairman’s concerns, she was
35
15Lencioni/Drawing 2/10/02 3:35 PM Page 35
36
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
remarkably calm and shifted into CEO mode immediately.
“Okay, what I’m about to say is not meant in any way to
be defensive or rude.”
“I know that, Kathryn.”
“Good, because I’m not going to mince my words—not
with you.”
“And I appreciate that.”
“You may not after you hear what I have to say.”
He forced a laugh. “Okay, I’m sitting down.”
“First, don’t think that I’m just randomly setting fires to
get my kicks. I’ve been watching these people carefully for
the past two weeks, and everything I’m doing, and every-
thing I’m about to do, is purposeful and intentional. I didn’t
tweak Martin because I felt like it in the moment.”
“I know, it’s just that . . .”
Kathryn interrupted politely. “Hear me out. This is im-
portant.”
“Okay, go ahead.”
“Now, if you knew how to do what I am trying to do,
you wouldn’t need me. Am I right?”
“You’re right.”
“You see, I honestly appreciate your concern for the
company, and for me, and I know you mean well on both
counts. But based on this call, I’d have to say that your good
intentions are hurting the company more than helping it.”
“I’m sorry, but I’m not understanding you.”
Kathryn went on. “Well, over the past eighteen months,
you’ve been fairly active with Jeff and the rest of the team,
15Lencioni/Drawing 2/10/02 3:35 PM Page 36
37
Drawing the Line
more so than most board chairmen, and you’ve watched
this team spiral further and further into dysfunction and
chaos. And now you’ve asked me to help you pull them
out of it. Isn’t that what you want?”
“Absolutely. That’s exactly what I want.”
“Then I have a single question for you: Are you pre-
pared for the consequences of letting me do this right? Now
don’t answer right away.” She caught him just as the words
were coming out of his mouth. “Think about it for a second.”
She let the question sit there before continuing. “This is
not going to be easy. Or pretty. Not for the company. Not
for the executives. Not for me. And not for you.”
The Chairman remained silent, resisting the temptation
to assure her that he was prepared to do whatever she
needed.
Kathryn interpreted his silence as permission to continue
her pointed lecture. “You’ve probably heard my husband say
that a fractured team is just like a broken arm or leg; fixing
it is always painful, and sometimes you have to rebreak it to
make it heal correctly. And the rebreak hurts a lot more than
the initial break, because you have to do it on purpose.”
After another long pause, the Chairman spoke. “Okay,
Kathryn, I hear you. Do whatever you have to do. I won’t
get in the way.”
Kathryn could tell that he meant it.
Then he asked, “But I do have one final question: How
much of this team are you going to have to rebreak?”
“I should know by the end of the month.”
15Lencioni/Drawing 2/10/02 3:35 PM Page 37
NAPA
Kathryn chose the Napa Valley for the off-site because it wasclose enough to the office to avoid expensive and time-consuming travel, but just far enough to feel out of town. And regardless of how many times people have been there,
it always seems to make them slow down a pace or two.
The hotel where the meeting would take place was a
small inn located in the town of Yountville. Kathryn liked
it because it was reasonably priced during the off-season
and had just one large and comfortable conference room.
It was on the second floor, had its own balcony, and over-
looked acres of vineyards.
The meeting was to start at 9:00 A.M., which meant that
most of the team would have to leave their homes fairly
early in the morning to arrive on time. By 8:45, everyone
had arrived, checked their luggage at the front desk, and
was seated at the conference table. Everyone but Martin,
that is.
38
16Lencioni/Napa 2/10/02 3:35 PM Page 38
39
Napa
Though no one said anything about him, the way they
were checking their watches suggested they were all won-
dering whether he would be on time. Even Kathryn seemed
a bit nervous.
She didn’t want the first activity of the meeting to be
a reprimand of someone for being late. Then, for a split
second, she felt a flash of panic, wondering what she would
do if he just didn’t show up at all. She couldn’t very well
fire him for not coming to a meeting, could she? Did she
have that kind of political capital with the board? How
valuable is this guy, anyway?
When Martin came through the door at 8:59, Kathryn
breathed an inaudible sigh of relief and chastised herself
for worrying so much. She took comfort in knowing that
she was finally about to begin what she had been waiting
to do for almost a month. And as concerned as she was
about the attitudes of the people sitting around the table,
Kathryn could not deny that moments like this were a big
part of why she loved being a leader.
16Lencioni/Napa 2/10/02 3:35 PM Page 39
THE SPEECH
Martin took the only remaining chair at the end of the con-ference table opposite Kathryn. As soon as he sat down, heremoved his laptop computer from its case and put it on the table in front of him, leaving it closed for the moment.
Determined not to be distracted, Kathryn smiled at her
staff and addressed them calmly and gracefully.
“Good morning, everyone. I’d like to start the day by
saying a few words. And this won’t be the last time I say
them.” No one knew just how serious Kathryn was about
that remark.
“We have a more experienced and talented executive
team than any of our competitors. We have more cash than
they do. Thanks to Martin and his team, we have better
core technology. And we have a more powerful board of
directors. Yet in spite of all that, we are behind two of our
competitors in terms of both revenue and customer growth.
Can anyone here tell me why that is?”
Silence.
40
17Lencioni/Speech 2/10/02 3:36 PM Page 40
41
The Speech
Kathryn continued, still as warmly as when she started.
“After interviewing with every member of our board and
spending time with each of you, and then talking to most
of our employees, it is very clear to me what our prob-
lem is.” She paused before completing the thought. “We
are not functioning as a team. In fact, we are quite dysfunc-
tional.”
A few of the staff members shot glances toward Jeff
to see how he would react. He seemed fine, but Kathryn
picked up on the tension.
“I’m not saying this to call out Jeff, or anyone else, in
particular. It’s just a fact. One that we are going to begin ad-
dressing over these next two days. And, yes, I know how
ridiculous and unbelievable it feels for you to be out of the
office for so many days this month. But by the end of it all,
everyone who is still here will understand why this is so
important.”
That last comment got everyone’s attention. “That’s right.
I want to say right up front that DecisionTech is going to ex-
perience some changes during the next few months, and it
is very possible that some of us here won’t find the new
company to be the kind of place where we want to be. That
isn’t a threat or a dramatic device, and I don’t have anyone
in particular in mind. It’s just a realistic probability, and it’s
nothing to be in denial about. All of us are eminently em-
ployable, and it wouldn’t be the end of the world for any-
one to leave if that is the right thing for the company—and
the team.”
17Lencioni/Speech 2/10/02 3:36 PM Page 41
42
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
Kathryn stood and went to the white board, careful not
to come across as arrogant or condescending. “Let me as-
sure those of you who might be wondering about all of this
that everything we are going to be doing is about one thing
only: making this company succeed. That’s all. We’re not
going to be catching each other falling out of trees.”
A few of her staff members chuckled.
“And we certainly won’t be holding hands, singing
songs, or getting naked.”
Even Martin managed a smile while the others laughed
out loud.
“I want to assure you that there is only one reason that
we are here at this off-site, and at the company: to achieve
results. This, in my opinion, is the only true measure of a
team, and it will be the focus of everything we do today
and as long as I’m here. It is my expectation that next year
and the year after that, we will be able to look back on rev-
enue growth, profitability, customer retention, and satisfac-
tion, and if the market is right for it, maybe even an IPO.
But I can promise you that none of that will happen if we
do not address the issues that are preventing us from act-
ing like a team.”
Kathryn paused to let everyone digest the simplicity of
her message, and then continued. “So how do we go about
this? Over the years I’ve come to the conclusion that there
are five reasons why teams are dysfunctional.”
She then drew a triangle on the white board and divided
it with four horizontal lines, creating five separate sections.
17Lencioni/Speech 2/10/02 3:36 PM Page 42
43
The Speech
Kathryn then turned back to the group. “Over the course
of the next two days, we are going to be filling in this model
and dealing with each issue one at a time. And you’ll notice
immediately that none of this is rocket science. In fact, it will
seem remarkably simple on paper. The trick is putting it into
practice.”
“Right now I’d like to start with the first dysfunction: ab-
sence of trust.” She turned and wrote the phrase at the bot-
tom of the triangle.
The staff members read the words silently, and most of
them frowned as if to say, Is that all you’ve got?
Kathryn was used to this and continued. “Trust is the
foundation of real teamwork. And so the first dysfunction
is a failure on the part of team members to understand and
17Lencioni/Speech 2/10/02 3:36 PM Page 43
44
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
open up to one another. And if that sounds touchy-feely,
let me explain, because there is nothing soft about it. It is
an absolutely critical part of building a team. In fact, it’s
probably the most critical.”
Some of the people in the room were clearly in need of
an explanation.
“Great teams do not hold back with one another,” she
said. “They are unafraid to air their dirty laundry. They ad-
mit their mistakes, their weaknesses, and their concerns
without fear of reprisal.”
Most of the staff seemed to be accepting the point, but
without a lot of enthusiasm.
Kathryn pushed on. “The fact is, if we don’t trust one
another—and it seems to me that we don’t—then we can-
not be the kind of team that ultimately achieves results.
And so that is where we’re going to focus first.”
17Lencioni/Speech 2/10/02 3:36 PM Page 44
PUSHING BACK
The room was silent, until Jan raised her hand.
Kathryn smiled. “I may have been a school teacher once,
but you don’t have to raise your hand to talk. Feel free to
jump in any time.”
Jan nodded and asked her question. “I’m not trying to
be negative or contradictory here, but I’m just wondering
why you don’t think we trust each other. Is it possible that
you just don’t know us very well yet?”
Kathryn paused to consider the question, wanting to
give a thoughtful answer. “Well, my assessment is based on
quite a bit of data, Jan. Specific comments from the board,
employees, even many of you.”
Jan seemed content with the answer, but Kathryn de-
cided to continue. “But I’d have to say that more than any-
thing I’ve been told by others, I see a trust problem here in
the lack of debate that exists during staff meetings and other
interactions among this team. But I don’t want to get ahead
of myself, because that’s a separate part of the model en-
tirely.”
45
18Lencioni/Pushing 2/10/02 3:36 PM Page 45
46
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
Nick was not about to let it go. “But that doesn’t always
mean there is an absence of trust, does it?” The question
was more of a statement than anything else. Everyone in
the room, including Martin and Mikey, seemed eager for
Kathryn’s response.
“No, not necessarily, I guess.”
Nick was momentarily pleased that his comment was
deemed to be correct.
Until Kathryn clarified. “Theoretically, if everyone is
completely on the same page and working in lockstep to-
ward the same goals with no sense of confusion, then I
suppose a lack of debate might be a good sign.”
More than one of the staff members began to smile
sheepishly at the description that certainly did not apply to
them. Nick’s satisfaction disappeared.
Kathryn continued to direct her explanation toward
him. “But I’d have to say that every effective team I’ve ever
observed had a substantial level of debate. Even the most
trusting teams mixed it up a lot.” Now she directed a ques-
tion to the rest of the room. “Why do you suppose there is
so little passionate discussion or debate among this group?”
At first no one answered, and Kathryn let them sit in
the uncomfortable silence. Then Mikey mumbled some-
thing under her breath.
“I’m sorry, Mikey. I didn’t hear you.” Kathryn did her
best to conceal her distaste for sarcastic remarks, which she
had developed teaching seventh graders.
18Lencioni/Pushing 2/10/02 3:36 PM Page 46
47
Pushing Back
Mikey clarified, louder now. “There isn’t enough time.
I think we’re all too busy to have lengthy debates about
minor issues. We’re drowning in work as it is.”
Kathryn sensed that the others might not agree with
Mikey, but she wondered if anyone dared challenge her.
She was about to do so herself, when Jeff offered tenta-
tively, “I’m not sure I’m with you on that one, Mikey. I don’t
think we lack the time to argue. I think we’re just not com-
fortable challenging each other. And I’m not sure why.”
Mikey responded quickly, if not sharply. “Maybe be-
cause our meetings are always too structured and boring.”
The mother in Kathryn wanted to step in and protect
Jeff, partly to reward him for having stood up to Mikey. But
she decided to let things go.
After a pause, Carlos chimed in gently, but without di-
recting his comments at Mikey, as though the entire group
had made the remark. “Now wait a minute, everyone. I
agree that meetings have been pretty dull and that the
agenda is usually a little too full. But I think we all could
have challenged each other more. We certainly don’t all
agree on everything.”
Nick spoke up. “I don’t think we agree on anything.”
They all laughed—except Martin, who had opened his
laptop and turned it on.
Kathryn joined the livening conversation. “So you
don’t agree on most things, and yet you don’t seem will-
ing to admit that you have concerns. Now, I’m no Ph.D.
18Lencioni/Pushing 2/10/02 3:36 PM Page 47
48
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
in psychology, but that’s a trust issue if I’ve ever heard
one.” A few of the heads in the room actually nodded in
agreement with Kathryn, something she appreciated like
a starving person given a few morsels of bread.
And then the typing sound began. Martin, now com-
pletely checked out of the conversation, was banging away
at his keyboard like, well, like a computer programmer.
Distracted by the sound, everyone in the room glanced at
Martin for a nanosecond. And that was enough to kill what-
ever momentum the conversation had generated.
Kathryn had both relished this moment and dreaded it
from the first staff meeting she had observed. And as much
as she wanted to avoid another run-in with Martin, espe-
cially so early in the day, she would not let the opportu-
nity pass her by.
18Lencioni/Pushing 2/10/02 3:36 PM Page 48
ENTERING THE DANGER
The tension in the room began to mount as Kathryn watchedMartin type away at the other end of the table. No onereally thought she would say anything. But they didn’t know Kathryn very well.
“Excuse me, Martin.”
Martin finished typing and then looked up to acknowl-
edge his boss.
“Are you working on something?” Kathryn’s question
was sincere, without even a hint of sarcasm.
The room froze, waiting anxiously for the answer to
the question they had been wanting to ask for the past two
years.
Martin seemed as though he wasn’t going to respond at
all, then said, “I’m taking notes, actually,” and continued
typing.
Kathryn remained calm and continued to speak in a
measured tone. “I think this is a good time to talk about
49
19Lencioni/Danger 2/10/02 3:37 PM Page 49
50
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
ground rules for the off-site and for our meetings going
forward.”
Martin looked up from his computer, and Kathryn con-
tinued, directing her comments to the entire group. “I don’t
have a lot of rules when it comes to meetings. But there are
a few that I’m a stickler about.”
Everyone waited for her to begin.
“Basically, I want you all to do two things: be present
and participate. That means everyone needs to be fully en-
gaged in whatever we’re talking about.”
Even Martin knew when to pull back a little. He asked
a question, but in a slightly conciliatory tone that the group
was not accustomed to hearing from their chief scientist.
“What about when the conversation is not relevant to every-
one? Sometimes it seems that we talk about issues that
would best be handled off-line. One-on-one.”
“That’s a good point.” Kathryn was reeling Martin in
now. “If there is ever a time when that happens, when we
think that we’re wasting the group’s time by dealing with
issues that should be dealt with outside the meeting, then
everyone here should feel free to speak up.”
Martin seemed pleased that she had agreed with him.
Kathryn went on. “But for everything else, I want every-
one fully engaged. And while I understand that some peo-
ple prefer to use a computer rather than a notebook, like
you, Martin, I’ve found that it’s just too distracting. It’s easy
to imagine the person sitting there checking e-mail or
working on something else.”
19Lencioni/Danger 2/10/02 3:37 PM Page 50