potter’s box case 6b

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1BPxdH0WkUf2_pCJODxOrM5XIdIVeOeuG?usp=sharing (case study and textbook pdf can be found on the link)

 

For this assignment I would like you to utilize the steps in Potter’s Box to justify whether “doxxing” is an ethical decision. Write the paper in third-person.

 

Clearly state the facts of the case study in the beginning/first paragraph. Facts section clearly and adequately describes the facts of the situation.

 

Then on the second paragraph provide 3 values and explain why it is relevant to the case. These are values the writer determines are important to consider in the case, not guesses at the values of people involved in the case. Reference the textbook.

 

On the third paragraph provide 2-3 ethical principles, clearly explain why it is relevant to your decision. Principles section states which ethical principles should be used in reaching a decision, and why.

 

In the fourth paragraph provide 3 loyalties and explain their relevance. Loyalties section discusses to whom primary loyalties belong, and discusses the dilemmas faced in making choices; includes references to the textbook and other reading.

 

Fifth paragraph is closing statement, reiterate your position and final judgement. Judgment section presents the process the writer went through in making a final decision, with references to the textbook and other reading.

 

The paper frames arguments in terms of the philosophies and decision-making processes discussed in the textbook and it emphasizes reasoning and logic and avoids personal opinion.

 

The paper should also explain the philosophies and the process the writer went through in making a final decision