I need help with this discussion board. roughly, the answer must be approximately 300 word and 100 words of reply back to a classmate. I have attach 2 file; 1 is a discussion rubric, and 2 is a classmate’s post. If you have more questions, do not hesitate to ask.
Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person. How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible? Why or why not?
Please refer to the grading criteria in discussion #1 for this and all future posts.
(complete after reading 2.2)